<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695999837490" alt="India reports 40 new COVID-19 cases, active caseload at 476" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

India has reported a single-day rise of 40 new COVID-19 cases, as per the latest data released by the Union Health Ministry. The country's active caseload now stands at 476 cases. The total death toll due to the virus has reached 5,32,031 (5.32 lakh), with the recent data update on Friday.
India's total COVID-19 case tally currently stands at 4,49,98,741 (4.49 crore). However, encouragingly, 4,44,66,244 (4.44 crore) people have recovered from the disease, leading to a national recovery rate of 98.81 percent. The case fatality rate is presently recorded at 1.18 percent, indicating a relatively low mortality rate.
In terms of vaccinations, India continues to make significant progress. The country has administered a total of 220.67 crore COVID-19 vaccine doses so far. This substantial vaccination drive is a crucial step in controlling the spread of the virus and protecting public health.
As the nation continues its efforts to combat the ongoing pandemic, monitoring these statistics remains vital to understanding the trajectory of COVID-19 in India. The consistent updates from health authorities serve as essential information for both policymakers and the general public, guiding the collective actions taken to manage the situation effectively.

India reports 40 new COVID-19 cases, active caseload at 476

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695908204525" alt="Senior IPS officer Rakesh Balwal transferred to Manipur amid ongoing violence in the state" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

In response to the escalating violence in Manipur, the Central government has expedited the transfer of senior IPS officer Rakesh Balwal from Jammu and Kashmir to the northeastern state.
Rakesh Balwal, an IPS officer from the 2012 batch, currently serving as the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) in Srinagar, has been reassigned to his home cadre in Manipur. Balwal had assumed his role as Srinagar SSP in late 2021.
An official order stated, "The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet has approved the proposal of the Ministry of Home Affairs for premature repatriation of Rakesh Balwal, IPS, from AGMUT cadre to Manipur cadre."
Before his appointment as the Srinagar SSP, Balwal had served on deputation with the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for three and a half years as a Superintendent of Police. During his tenure with the NIA, he was a crucial member of the team that investigated the 2019 Pulwama terror attack, in which 40 CRPF personnel tragically lost their lives.
Manipur has witnessed a surge in violence over the past few months, with over 180 people losing their lives and several hundred sustaining injuries. The unrest initially erupted on May 3rd when a 'Tribal Solidarity March' was organised in the hill districts of Manipur. This march was a response to the demands of the majority Meitei community for Scheduled Tribe status.
Recently, another wave of violence, led by students, erupted in the state capital. This violence was triggered by the circulation of photographs of two youths who had gone missing in July.
Protests turned violent, with reports of a mob vandalising the deputy commissioner's office in Imphal West and setting fire to two vehicles. Violent confrontations with security forces also occurred in various areas, including Uripok, Yaiskul, Sagolband, and Tera, on Wednesday night. As a response, security forces resorted to firing several rounds of tear gas shells to regain control of the situation, according to officials.

Senior IPS officer transferred to Manipur amid ongoing violence in the state

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695831655462" alt="Delhi HC seeks response from Centre on plea against Zero qualifying percentile in NEET-PG 2023" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The Delhi High Court, on Wednesday, September 27th, has called upon the Centre and the National Board of Examination (NBE) to provide their responses to a petition challenging <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/ce91be19-2d6d-415f-8c3d-529a5d85df64/neetpg-cutoff-lowered-to-zero-a-controversial-move" target="_blank">the reduction of the cut-off qualifying percentile to zero</a> for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test Postgraduate (NEET-PG) 2023 counselling.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav also requested the Medical Counselling Committee to address the concerns raised in the petition, which was filed by three doctors who participated in the NEET-PG 2023 examination held on March 5th and subsequently engaged in the counselling process.
The medical professionals holding MBBS degrees have taken issue with a decision made by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on September 20th. In this decision, candidates were notified of the reduction in the qualifying percentile for PG courses in NEET-PG 2023, a change that occurred during the ongoing admission session.
The candidates were shocked to note that the qualifying percentile has been reduced to zero percentile, that is, minus 40 marks across all categories, the petition stated, represented by advocate Tanvi Dubey, stated.
The petitioners argue that the government's decision was flawed, unsustainable, legally unsound, and should be overturned.
"By reducing the eligibility criteria to zero percentile, that is, minus 40 marks, the very purpose of conducting the NEET PG exam stands defeated. It also fades away the entire purpose of a National Eligibility cum Entrance test' if the quotient of eligibility' itself is diluted. The passing of the impugned order will also mean that the respondents have given importance to seat filling even when the same amounts to sacrificing certain standards," the plea explained.
On September 25th, the Supreme Court declined to entertain a petition challenging the reduction of the cut-off qualifying percentile to zero for counselling.
A notice issued by the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC), Directorate of Health Services, Government of India, informed candidates about the reduction of the qualifying percentile for PG Courses (Medical/Dental) in NEET PG counselling 2023 to "zero" across all categories.

Delhi HC seeks response from Centre on plea against Zero qualifying percentile in NEET-PG 2023

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695826116955" alt="Sand Mafia row: ED raids TN BJP office accountant's residence" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

In an unexpected turn of events, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted a raid on the residence of the accountant at Kamalalayam, the BJP headquarters of Tamil Nadu, on Tuesday, September 26th. The operation, however, concluded within a span of four hours.
This development comes <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/816e8bf9-1aa4-4947-ac24-51d1394e5891/ed-launches-raids-across-tamil-nadu-in-crackdown-on-sand-mafia" target="_blank">in the wake of recent ED raids</a> targeting individuals associated with the sand mafia in Tamil Nadu. The ED's searches extended to several real estate agents in Chennai, with a focus on the properties of Shanmugam, a prominent realtor operating in the state capital.
A team of seven ED officials made their way to Shanmugam's apartment located in T Nagar, Chennai. Simultaneously, they carried out a raid on the residence of Jothikumar, who serves as an accountant at the Tamil Nadu BJP office and had been residing in an apartment owned by Shanmugam on a rental basis.
Sources indicate that during the ED's investigations into sand contractors K Rathinam, S Ramachandran, and Karikalan, it was discovered that a monthly transfer of funds was being made to Shanmugam's bank account. Subsequently, cash transactions between Jothikumar and the real estate agent were identified upon scrutinising Shanmugam's financial records.
Prompted by these findings, ED officials questioned Jothikumar regarding these transactions and his connections with Shanmugam and the sand contractors. The news of the raid quickly spread, leading BJP representatives to rush to Jothikumar's residence. Surprisingly, they were granted access to the property during the ongoing search, it was reported.
The ED's search operations were concluded around noon on Tuesday. It was later confirmed that Jothikumar had no involvement in the transactions between the sand contractors and Shanmugam. According to reports, since Jothikumar was residing in the apartment, he was questioned by the ED officials. After verifying all the credentials, the ED officials let him go.
Regarding inquiries about any pressure from the Union Finance Ministry on the ED team, sources explained that the matter had been escalated to the BJP high command, and the decision to conduct the search operation on Jothikumar was deemed unwise.
Sources from the ED revealed that the probe agency possesses documentary evidence establishing monetary transactions linking Jothikumar, Shanmugam, and the sand contractors. However, no official statement has been issued by the ED regarding these raids.
In earlier raids conducted this week on sand contractors, the ED seized ₹12.82 crore of unaccounted-for cash along with 1 kg of gold. The agency also sought information pertaining to sand sales from the Water Resources Department and Public Works Department.
During the extensive raids, encompassing 34 locations, including eight mining yards across six districts, the ED uncovered fake sales receipts and duplicate QR codes used in the illegal sale of sand units throughout the state.

Sand Mafia row: ED raids TN BJP office accountant's residence

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695824982779" alt="SC to hear Naidu's plea to quash FIR in Skill Development Scam on October 3rd" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

On September 27, the Supreme Court announced its intention to address the plea filed by former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and TDP leader, Nara Chandrababu Naidu, to dismiss the FIR related to the multi-crore <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/politics/40a38ff6-99f4-4149-b971-756bfeec091f/former-ap-cm-chandrababu-naidu-faces-charges-in-skill-development-program-scam-case" target="_blank">Skill Development Scam.</a>&nbsp;
This decision followed the recusal of Justice SVN Bhatti, who was initially presiding over the case alongside Justice Sanjiv Khanna.
Subsequently, the matter was presented before a different bench, presided over by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. This new bench scheduled the hearing for Naidu's request to quash the FIR on October 3.
In light of the Supreme Court's impending hearing, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) Court in Vijayawada decided to postpone the hearing on Naidu's bail application and the petition from the Crime Investigation Department (CID) seeking his custody to October 4.
<ins>Trial court proceedings to go as planned</ins>
The Supreme Court bench overseeing the case emphasised that it would not intervene in the proceedings of the trial court scheduled for Wednesday.
Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, who represents Nara Chandrababu Naidu, brought attention to the significance of the matter, emphasising that it pertained to personal liberty and questioned the absence of prosecution sanction.
Luthra cited provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, highlighting that the police could not seek Naidu's custody beyond 15 days from the date of his arrest, considering that Naidu was detained on September 9.
In response, senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, representing the Andhra Pradesh government, informed the bench that the trial court (ACB Court in Vijayawada) was already handling Naidu's bail plea, and the court would receive information about the outcome on October 3.
Luthra clarified that he was not currently pressing for bail, but was focused on the issue regarding the police's authority to seek custody after the initial 15 days of arrest.
Ranjit Kumar explained that the Andhra Pradesh Crime Investigation Department (CID) required custody to confront Naidu with specific documents related to the case.
<ins>Developer’s obligation relaxed</ins>
During the proceedings, Ranjit Kumar referred to the skill development project and highlighted that initially, 90 percent of the project's funding was supposed to be contributed by the project developer, with the remaining 10 percent coming from the state. However, he pointed out that the developer's 90 percent funding obligation had later been relaxed.
Earlier in the day, there was a notable development when Justice SVN Bhatti recused himself from hearing the case. As the matter was brought up for consideration, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, leading a bench that included Justice SVN Bhatti, stated, "My brother (Justice Bhatti) has some reservations about hearing the matter."
Justice Khanna further clarified that Justice Bhatti, who had recently been appointed to the Supreme Court, and had previously served in the Andhra Pradesh High Court, was recusing himself from the case. He mentioned that the matter would be scheduled for the following week.
However, legal representatives Harish Salve and Sidharth Luthra, both representing Chandrababu Naidu, requested that the bench temporarily set aside the matter. Their intention was to bring it before Chief Justice Chandrachud for potential listing before a different bench.
<ins>Delay in ACB court hearing</ins>
Following the presentation of arguments by counsels representing the Crime Investigation Department (CID) and Nara Chandrababu Naidu on Wednesday, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) court opted to delay the pronouncement of its verdict until October 4th. This decision coincides with the anticipated delivery of a Supreme Court ruling the day prior.
On Tuesday, the ACB Court had originally slated the hearing for two petitions – one submitted by Naidu, requesting bail, and the other by the Andhra Pradesh CID, seeking custody of Naidu for five days.
These hearings were subsequently postponed to Wednesday. The court will conclude the examination of arguments presented by both prosecution and defence attorneys on the same day and subsequently issue a verdict concerning the police custody plea and Naidu's bail application.
Notably, the prosecution asserted that during Naidu's two-day stint in police custody, which concluded on Sunday, he failed to cooperate. Regardless of the arguments presented, the court expressed its intent to deliver a verdict on October 4th.
Nara Chandrababu Naidu, the former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, was arrested on September 9th on charges of misappropriating funds from the Skill Development Corporation, which purportedly resulted in a loss of ₹371 crore to the state exchequer.
Originally, the ACB Court had planned to hear Naidu's bail plea on Tuesday. However, at the insistence of the CID, which sought consideration of its petition, the court decided to entertain both petitions simultaneously on the same day. The court also instructed Naidu's legal representatives to submit their response to the CID's recent request for custody by Tuesday.
Additionally, the ACB Court has scheduled matters related to PT warrants in the Amaravati inner ring road and fibrenet cases for October 4th. Concurrently, proceedings were concluded in the case of Naidu's anticipatory bail plea filed in the Andhra Pradesh High Court concerning the Inner Ring Road case. Notably, the CID designated Naidu's son, Nara Lokesh, as accused number 14 (A14) in this case. Following his inclusion in the case, Lokesh submitted an anticipatory bail plea to the court.
The CID is actively investigating irregularities associated with alterations made to the alignment of the Amaravati Capital Inner Ring road.
<ins>Vital information needed from Naidu, says CID</ins>
In a fresh petition submitted to the court, the Crime Investigation Department (CID) has articulated the necessity of detaining Nara Chandrababu Naidu, asserting that his custody is pivotal for procuring vital information regarding the involvement of other individuals in a multi-crore scam and the intricate orchestration and execution of the conspiracy.
The CID underscored that due to suspicions surrounding Naidu, his family members, and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) as the presumed ultimate beneficiaries of the ill-gotten gains, it is imperative to subject him to further interrogation.
Additionally, the CID stressed the importance of verifying whether the proceeds of the crime are concealed within the accounts of Vikas Kanvilkar, an accused in the case.
Stressing on the gravity of the offense, characterised by financial misconduct committed by public officials entangled in an elaborate conspiracy, the CID argued that Naidu's interrogation is indispensable to uncover all facets of the plot contrived to serve the interests of private individuals.
The CID further revealed its discovery during the course of the investigation, noting that substantial sums of cash had been deposited into the TDP's bank accounts between 2018 and 2020.

SC to hear Naidu's plea to quash FIR in Skill Development Scam on October 3rd

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695821024134" alt="NIA detains aide of Canada-based terrorist Arsh Dala in Punjab raid" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has apprehended an associate of Arshdeep Singh, also known as Arsh Dala, a gangster-turned-terrorist based in Canada. The detention occurred during a raid in Punjab's Ferozepur district, marking a significant development in the crackdown on a terror-gangster network spanning India and Canada.
According to NIA officials, simultaneous raids were conducted at 51 locations across six states, linked to three separate cases involving associates of Lawrence Bishnoi, Davinder Bambiha, and Arsh Dala gangs. While Lawrence Bishnoi is currently incarcerated, Arsh Dala resides in Canada, and Davinder Bambiha was killed in a 2016 encounter with Punjab Police.
The individual detained during the Ferozepur raid was identified as Yunas, also known as Zora, hailing from Macchi Mandi in Ferozepur. The NIA took him into custody for interrogation due to incriminating chat details between Yunas and Arsh Dala. Reportedly, Yunas was receiving calls from Dala, indicating a connection to the terror-gangster network.
The NIA has been actively targeting terror outfits and individuals involved in conspiracies to smuggle arms, ammunition, explosives, and raise funds for potential attacks in India. It was discovered that gang members associated with the listed terrorist Arsh Dala conspired to fund the banned Khalistan Tiger Force (KTF) and engaged in the smuggling of arms and explosives from across the border.
Arsh Dala, operating from Canada for the past four years, has been implicated in guiding and commissioning terrorist acts, as well as promoting terror, violence, and large-scale extortion in India on behalf of the KTF.
To date, 16 individuals have been arrested in connection with this terror-gangster conspiracy case. The NIA's objective is to dismantle the nexus between terrorists, gangsters, and drug smugglers while disrupting their infrastructure and funding channels.

NIA detains aide of Canada-based terrorist Arsh Dala in Punjab raid

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695816343689" alt="Manipur turmoil: Jaishankar calls out migrants’ impact; AFSPA extends & INC calls for CM’s removal. Kuki and Meiti." style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar addressed the situation in Manipur, highlighting the joint efforts of the State and Central Governments to restore normalcy and ensure law and order in the region. Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations, he discussed various aspects of the complex issue.
Jaishankar acknowledged that one aspect of the problem in Manipur is the destabilising impact of migrants who have settled in the region. He also recognised the existence of historical tensions that predate recent developments. The State and Union governments are actively working to facilitate the return of normalcy, recover seized arms, and strengthen law enforcement to prevent incidents of violence.
Earlier this month, a group of United Nations experts expressed deep concern about reports of violence in Manipur, particularly targeting women and girls. They called upon the Indian government to take robust action to investigate these incidents and hold the perpetrators accountable.
India had responded by rejecting these comments, deeming them "unwarranted, presumptive, and misleading." Jaishankar clarified that the comments were made by the spokesperson, but he concurred with their accuracy.
The Minister was also questioned about reports from Sweden's V-Dem Institute and the U.S. government-funded NGO Freedom House that criticised India's state of freedom and democracy. In response, Jaishankar had criticised these organisations, referring to them as "self-appointed custodians of the world" who struggle to accept that India does not seek their approval. He further stated that many of these reports exhibit strong bias, distort facts, and contain numerous inaccuracies.
EAM Jaishankar addressed the situation in Manipur and defended India's position against international criticism. He emphasised the need for objectivity in assessing such reports and the government's commitment to addressing challenges in Manipur.
<ins>Manipur extends AFSPA for six months, excluding 19 police stations</ins>
The Manipur Government has announced the extension of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act 1958 (AFSPA) for an additional six months, effective from October 1. However, this extension applies only to parts of Manipur, excluding nineteen police stations in seven districts.
AFSPA has been in operation in Manipur (except the Imphal Municipality area) since 2004. In April 2022, AFSPA was revoked from 15 police station areas in six districts, and from April 1, the Disturbed Area notification was lifted from four other police stations. As a result, 19 police station limits in seven districts of Manipur were excluded from the disturbed area notification under AFSPA.
The decision to extend AFSPA comes as the Manipur Government cited the unavailability of its "sister agencies" to conduct a detailed on-ground assessment due to their engagement in maintaining law and order. They also noted the sensitivity of the issue, which could potentially lead to public criticism and resistance if not handled with care.
In their official statement, the Manipur Government stated, "Keeping in view of above and the overall law and order situation in the State and the capability of the State machineries, the State Government has decided to maintain status quo on the present disturbed area status in the State of Manipur excluding the areas falling under the 19 police stations for a period of 6 (six) months w.e.f. 01/10/2023."
The decision to extend AFSPA comes against the backdrop of ongoing violence in the State. The Army has urged that the valley districts be brought under the purview of AFSPA in light of these developments.
<ins>INC President Kharge calls for sacking of Manipur CM amid ongoing turmoil</ins>
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge has launched a scathing attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the situation in Manipur, demanding the removal of the BJP's "incompetent" Chief Minister as a crucial step to address the turmoil. In a statement posted on social media, Kharge expressed concern that Manipur had turned into a "battlefield" due to the BJP's actions, and he accused the party of weaponising violence against women and children.
The recent clash in the Singjamei area of Imphal on Tuesday night, involving RAF personnel and locals protesting the killing of two missing students since July 6, has intensified the state's unrest. Security forces deployed tear gas and rubber bullets against the protesters, resulting in injuries to 45 people, primarily students.
Manipur has been grappling with tensions since May 3, when ethnic clashes erupted in response to a 'Tribal Solidarity March' organised in the hill districts to protest against the majority Meitei community's demand for Scheduled Tribe status.
Kharge lamented the prolonged suffering of Manipur's people, calling out the absence of a visit from PM Modi despite 147 days of turmoil. He condemned the violence against women and children, characterising it as a weapon used during the unrest. Kharge emphasised that it was high time for PM Modi to dismiss Manipur's Chief Minister to mitigate further turmoil.
Former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram echoed Kharge's sentiments, asserting that the situation in Manipur had deteriorated, eroding confidence in the state government and Chief Minister N. Biren Singh. He blamed the CM's incompetence and bias as a major part of the problem and stressed that restoring normalcy required removing the government and the chief minister.
Chidambaram also mentioned reports of forced displacements in Senapati district and the spread of ethnic cleansing across various districts in Manipur. He criticised the central government's lack of response and concern for the 145-day-long cycle of violence that began on May 3, 2023.
The Congress party has been consistently questioning why PM Modi has not visited Manipur amidst the ongoing violence. As of Wednesday morning, the situation in Imphal remained tense, with heavy deployment of Manipur Police, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), and RAF personnel throughout the Imphal Valley. While schools in the region were closed for the day, some students had vowed to gather at their institutions.

Manipur turmoil: Jaishankar calls out migrants’ impact; AFSPA extends & INC calls for CM’s removal

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695762662980" alt="The Cauvery River dispute: A decades-long water struggle between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Stretching across 765 kilometers, the Cauvery River, a lifeline for southern India, originates in Karnataka's Talacauvery and flows through multiple states, including Tamil Nadu. Its waters have been a subject of dispute for over a century, and this contentious issue continues to challenge authorities and communities alike.
<ins>Historical Origins of the Cauvery Dispute</ins>
The roots of the Cauvery water sharing dispute can be traced back to the days of British colonial rule. In 1892, tensions emerged between the Madras Presidency, a British-administered territory, and the princely state of Mysore over the division of Cauvery's waters. These conflicts laid the foundation for a long-standing disagreement over water allocation.
The situation escalated in 1910, when discussions began regarding the construction of reservoirs to store Cauvery water. With no resolution in sight, the British authorities stepped in to mediate the dispute.
<ins>1924 Agreement: An Early Attempt at Resolution</ins>
In 1924, a significant agreement was reached between the Madras Presidency and the Mysore state. This agreement outlined the rules for utilising water from the Krishna Raja Sagar (KRS) dam. Notably, it granted Madras the freedom to construct the Mettur dam, marking a crucial development in the region's water management.
Under this agreement, Tamil Nadu and Puducherry were allocated 75% of the surplus water, while Karnataka received 23%, with the remainder going to Kerala. The agreement also imposed restrictions on the extent of land that could be irrigated.
<ins>Post-Independence Challenges</ins>
Following India's independence, the re-organisation of states in 1956 brought about new complexities. Protests and conflicts between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka became more frequent and sometimes even escalated into violence. Tamil Nadu opposed Karnataka's construction of dams on the Cauvery, arguing that it left the lower riparian state in a precarious position.
Karnataka contended that the 50-year period stipulated by the 1924 agreement had ended in 1974, implying that the state was no longer bound by its terms, especially given that the river originated in Karnataka. This created a dilemma for Tamil Nadu, which had become increasingly reliant on Cauvery water, particularly for agriculture in the delta region.
Between 1960 and the late 1980s, Karnataka constructed four dams on the Cauvery: Hemavati, Harangi, Kabini, and Suvarnavathy. Tamil Nadu, the lower riparian state, saw this as a threat to its water supply and approached the Supreme Court.
Karnataka argued that water sharing should follow international norms, suggesting an equal distribution among the states involved. Tamil Nadu, however, insisted on adhering to the 1924 agreement. In 1986, farmers' associations from Tamil Nadu's Thanjavur region approached the Supreme Court, demanding the formation of a tribunal to address the water-sharing dispute.
<ins>Formation of the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal</ins>
In 1990, the Supreme Court heard petitions from both states and attempted to facilitate negotiations. When dialogue failed to yield results, the court directed the central government to establish a tribunal to determine water allocation. Thus, the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) came into existence.
The CWDT analysed Cauvery's water inflow to Tamil Nadu between 1980 and 1990. In 1991, the tribunal issued an interim order requiring Karnataka to ensure the annual release of 205 tmc ft (thousand million cubic feet) of water to Tamil Nadu. The CWDT also instructed Karnataka to halt its expansion of irrigated land.
The tribunal's decision sparked protests and riots in both states. Karnataka rejected the tribunal's award and sought its annulment in the Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court upheld the tribunal's order, ruling against Karnataka's attempts to nullify it.
In 1993, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa conducted a hunger strike in Chennai, alleging non-compliance with the tribunal's interim order by Karnataka, which cited drought conditions as a reason for withholding water.
<ins>The Cauvery River Authority (CRA) and the Final Award</ins>
In 1998, the Cauvery River Authority (CRA) was established to implement the CWDT's interim order. The CRA, headed by the then Prime Minister and comprising the Chief Ministers of the four states involved, sought to navigate the ongoing dispute.
After years of deliberation and discord, the CWDT issued its final award in 2007. The allocation of the available 740 tmc ft water was as follows:
<ul>
<li>Tamil Nadu: 419 tmcft</li>
<li>Karnataka: 270 tmcft</li>
<li>Kerala: 30 tmcft</li>
<li>Puducherry: 7 tmcft</li>
</ul>
During a normal year, Karnataka was mandated to release 192 tmcft of water to Tamil Nadu, including 10 tmcft for environmental purposes, at the interstate border point of Billingundlu. However, during a distress year, the tribunal's order did not provide clear guidelines for water sharing among the states.
<ins>Ongoing Conflicts and Recent Developments</ins>
Since the central government notified the final award in 2013, conflicts over water sharing have persisted. In February 2018, the Supreme Court revised the water allocation, reducing Tamil Nadu's share to 177.25 tmc ft from 192 tmc ft. The court also noted that 20 tmc ft of groundwater in Tamil Nadu had not been accounted for.
This decision led to renewed tensions, with Karnataka expressing concerns about its ability to release water to Tamil Nadu during years of limited rainfall. On September 21, 2023, the Supreme Court ordered Karnataka to release 5,000 cubic feet per second (cusecs) of Cauvery water to Tamil Nadu, triggering protests and a state-wide bandh.
In response, Tamil Nadu requested the release of 7,200 cusecs of water per day from Karnataka's reservoirs. The ongoing dispute underscores the complexities of water allocation in a region heavily dependent on the Cauvery River.
The Cauvery water sharing issue remains a significant challenge for both states, requiring careful negotiation and resolution to ensure equitable access to this vital resource. The dispute reflects the intricate dynamics of water management, agriculture, and urban development in southern India. As stakeholders continue to grapple with these complexities, the future of Cauvery water sharing remains a topic of ongoing concern and debate.

The Cauvery River dispute: A decades-long water struggle

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695469300548" alt="NIA seizes Khalistan leader Gurpatwant Pannu's properties in Amritsar & Chandigarh" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has taken further steps to curb the activities of Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, a designated individual terrorist based in Canada and the founder of the outlawed Sikhs for Justice organisation. On Saturday, the NIA confiscated Pannu's properties in Amritsar and Chandigarh after confiscation orders were passed by the NIA special court in SAS Nagar, Mohali.
Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, a US-based lawyer, has been under the NIA's scrutiny since 2019 when the agency registered its first case against him. He has been accused of playing a significant role in promoting and commissioning terrorist acts, spreading fear, and using intimidation tactics in Punjab and other parts of India.
Pannu's ancestral village, Khankot, is located on the outskirts of Amritsar, and some of his properties there were already legally attached in connection with cases filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against him. The properties confiscated on Saturday include a 46-kanal piece of agricultural land in Khankot and one-fourth of House Number 2,033 at Sector 15/C in Chandigarh.
It's worth noting that Pannu has never lived in his ancestral village, and villagers claim they have never seen him in person, as his parents left the village long ago. The government has attached only Pannu's share in the family property.
The NIA has accused Pannu of misusing cyberspace to radicalise susceptible youth and incite them to commit acts of terrorism. He is alleged to be the primary handler and controller of Sikhs for Justice. The Indian government declared him a "designated individual terrorist" on July 1, 2020, and his organisation was deemed an "unlawful association" on July 10, 2019.
Pannu, a law graduate from Panjab University, has recently made headlines for allegedly threatening senior Indian diplomats and government officials in public forums. He has also threatened Canadian Hindus, asking them to leave Canada, claiming that they have adopted a "jingoistic approach" in favour of India.
The NIA's action to confiscate Pannu's properties is seen as a significant step in curbing his anti-India activities from abroad. His properties had already been legally attached following government orders in two different cases, and their confiscation has now been carried out under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) section 33(5) in a case registered under various sections of the UAPA on April 5, 2020.
In response to the confiscation of his properties, representatives of various organisations from Punjab held protests near Pannu's house in Chandigarh. In August 2022, during the Har Ghar Tiranga Abhiyan, activists had installed the Indian tricolour at his house.
Gurpatwant Singh Pannu's activities have raised concerns about the promotion of separatist ideologies and the potential to disrupt peace and security in India. The NIA's actions aim to counter these threats and ensure the safety and sovereignty of the country.

NIA seizes Khalistan leader Gurpatwant Pannu's properties in Amritsar & Chandigarh

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695386535585" alt="Moto GP issues apology for displaying distorted map of India" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

In a recent live broadcast of a practice session at the Buddh International Circuit, Moto GP found itself in hot water for displaying a distorted map of India. The controversial map omitted the union territories of Jammu &amp; Kashmir and Ladakh, leading to widespread criticism from netizens. Responding to the uproar, Moto GP issued an apology on Friday.
Taking to social media, Moto GP expressed its regret and clarified its intentions, saying, "We'd like to apologise to our fans in India for the map shown earlier as part of the MotoGP broadcast. It is never our intent to make any statement other than that of support and appreciation for our host country. We're excited to be able to enjoy the IndianOil Grand Prix of India with you and we're loving our first taste of Buddh International Circuit."

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695386888246" alt="Moto GP issues apology for displaying distorted map of India" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>


The IndianOil Grand Prix of India, previously known as MotoGP Bharat, will mark its debut in the 13th round of the 2023 season. This exciting event spans from Friday to Sunday, featuring riders competing on superbikes at speeds exceeding 300 km/h in their pursuit of the coveted checkered flag.
The controversy arose when eagle-eyed netizens noticed the distorted map during MotoGP's live-streamed practice sessions. Their observations ignited a vigorous online debate, with users on social networking platforms seeking an explanation from MotoGP and the Indian promoters regarding the use of the flawed map of India.

Moto GP issues apology for displaying distorted map of India

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695306737635" alt="Notorious Punjab gangster Sukha Duneke killed in Winnipeg, Canada" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Sukhdul Singh, alias Sukha Duneke, a notorious gangster hailing from Punjab and on the list of most-wanted criminals, met his demise in the Canadian city of Winnipeg, according to reliable sources. This development has sent shockwaves through the criminal underworld, shedding light on the international reach of Punjab's criminal networks.
Sukhdul Singh was a "Category A" gangster from Punjab's Moga district, had fled to Canada in 2017 using a counterfeit passport. During his time abroad, he maintained close ties with gangster and Khalistani terrorist Arshdeep Dalla. He was an active member of the infamous Davinder Bambiha gang and associated with a network of criminals, including gangster Lucky Patial, Malaysia-based gangster Jackpal Singh, alias Lali, and others.
From Canadian soil, Duneke had been orchestrating the operations of his gang, which primarily focused on running an extortion racket and targeting rival gang members in Punjab and neighbouring regions. His modus operandi involved leveraging local contacts and managing a network of associates based abroad.
His criminal activities had garnered significant attention, leading authorities to issue a lookout circular against him in 2022. Moreover, he was linked to the killing of international kabaddi player Sandeep Nangal Ambian in March of the previous year, with accusations of arranging shooters for the crime.
In a startling twist, Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi, a prominent figure in the criminal landscape, claimed responsibility for Sukhdul Singh's killing. Bishnoi's gang, in a Facebook post, accused Singh of playing a pivotal role in the murders of gangsters Gurlal Brar and Vicky Middukhera. They labeled Singh a "drug addict" who received "punishment for his sins" and issued a stern warning to their adversaries, emphasising their reach not only in India but in other countries as well.
Lawrence Bishnoi is also implicated in the murder case of singer Sidhu Moosewala, further complicating the web of criminal activities interlinking various notorious figures.
This development surrounding Sukhdul Singh's killing occurs against the backdrop of escalating diplomatic tensions between India and Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had recently accused Indian government agents of involvement in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. These international criminal connections underscore the complexity of addressing transnational crime and the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in curbing the influence of organised crime syndicates operating across borders.
The demise of Sukha Duneke serves as a stark reminder of the far-reaching networks of Punjab's criminal underworld, raising concerns about the global implications of these criminal activities and the need for international cooperation in combating organised crime.

Notorious Punjab gangster Sukha Duneke killed in Winnipeg, Canada

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695305289888" alt="NEET-PG 2023 cut-off lowered to Zero: A controversial move" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

In a surprising turn of events, the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) has announced that the qualifying percentile for the National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Post Graduate examination has been lowered to zero for all categories. This significant change, confirmed by an official notification from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, applies to both medical and dental PG courses.
This move, while opening doors for a wider pool of candidates, has sparked controversy and debate within the medical community. Let's delve into the background, implications, and reactions surrounding this decision.
<ins>Background – The NEET-PG Cut-off Issue</ins>
The NEET-PG examination serves as a critical gateway for medical graduates seeking admission to postgraduate courses in medical colleges across India. The qualifying percentile, which is the minimum score required to be eligible for counselling and admission, has been a topic of concern and debate for some time.
The Indian Medical Association (IMA), in response to the delayed counselling process caused by the cut-off issue, wrote a letter to Union Health Minister Mansukh Mandaviya on September 13th. In this letter, the IMA requested a reduction in the NEET-PG 2023 cut-off percentile by up to 30 percent. The IMA argued that this reduction would enable a larger number of aspiring doctors to enroll in postgraduate programs, preventing the possibility of vacant postgraduate seats.
<ins>The Controversial Decision – NEET-PG 2023 Cut-off Set to Zero</ins>
In response to these demands, the MCC, which oversees the NEET-PG counselling process, took a drastic step by setting the qualifying percentile to zero. This means that regardless of their scores, all candidates are now eligible for the third round of PG counselling.
While this decision aims to address the backlog of counselling caused by the cut-off issue, it has not been well-received within the medical community. Doctors, medical associations, and experts have raised concerns about the implications of this move.
<ins>Critics Express Concerns</ins>
Critics argue that reducing the qualifying percentile to zero undermines the principles of meritocracy and potentially benefits students who may need more academic support. Dr. Rohan Krishnan, Chairman of the Federation of All India Doctors’ Association (FAIMA), expressed concerns about the decision's impact on the standard of medical education and the healthcare system.
Dr. Deepak Krishnamoorthy, a medical professional, questioned the move, saying, "Zero percentile is the new cut off! It is high time patients ask their treating doctors about their academic performance and how they got into their MBBS, PG, and super specialty."
<ins>Impact on Healthcare Quality</ins>
One of the primary concerns raised by critics is the potential compromise of healthcare quality. Medical professionals argue that a merit-based selection process is crucial for maintaining the competence of healthcare providers. Lowering the cut-off to zero may raise questions about whether candidates with strong subject knowledge and skills are being adequately identified and selected.
Dr. G. Balaji of the Telangana Junior Doctors’ Association emphasised the direct link between the quality of healthcare and the competence of medical professionals. He stated, "It may compromise the overall quality of medical education and, by extension, the quality of healthcare services. Ensuring that healthcare professionals are well-prepared and qualified is vital for the nation’s healthcare system."
<ins>Mixed Reactions and Ongoing Debate</ins>
While the decision to set the NEET-PG 2023 cut-off to zero has been met with criticism from some quarters, it has been welcomed by others. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) expressed satisfaction with the decisions taken by the Health Ministry.
As this debate unfolds, it remains to be seen how this move will impact the medical education landscape and the quality of healthcare in India. The MCC is expected to announce a fresh schedule for the third round of PG Counselling soon, providing further clarity on the path forward for aspiring medical professionals.
In conclusion, the decision to reduce the NEET-PG 2023 cut-off to zero has stirred controversy within the medical community, raising questions about meritocracy, healthcare quality, and the future of medical education in India.

NEET-PG 2023 cut-off lowered to Zero: A controversial move

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695287220295" alt="Unveiling the journey: The history of Women's Reservation Bill in India" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

On Wednesday, the Lok Sabha successfully passed the Constitution (128th Amendment) Bill, 2023, commonly known as the Women's Reservation Bill. This historic legislation allocates one-third of the seats in both the parliament and State legislative assemblies exclusively for women.
During the voting process, Lok Sabha members cast their votes using slips, resulting in 454 Members of Parliament (MPs) voting in favour of the bill, with only 2 MPs opposing it.
Union Minister of State for Law &amp; Justice, Arjun Ram Meghwal, introduced the bill on Tuesday, despite initial opposition from MPs who had not been given the opportunity to review a copy beforehand. The government clarified that the bill had been "uploaded in the supplementary list of business," leading to its introduction via a voice vote.
The primary objective of this bill is to ensure that one-third of all seats in the Lok Sabha and State legislative assemblies are reserved for women. Additionally, seats that were previously reserved for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) will now also fall under the purview of women's reservation.
The Bill stipulates that the reservation of seats for women will come to an end 15 years following the enactment of this Amendment Act.
The call for women's reservation in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies has deep roots that span decades. Discussions on this matter date back to the Constituent Assembly's deliberations following India's independence. Here is a concise overview of the historical context surrounding the demand for women's reservation.
====================
Also Read – <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/politics/eb76e737-926f-4158-869a-11b531bd49dc/politics-passage-implementation-womens-reservation-bill-explained" target="_blank">Politics, passage, implementation – Women's Reservation Bill explained</a>&nbsp;
====================
<ins>Historical Background</ins>
<ins>Government of India Act of 1935</ins>
The Act established 41 reserved seats within provincial legislatures and implemented limited reservations in the Central Legislatures.
In her paper titled 'Competing Inequalities: The Struggle Over Reserved Legislative Seats for Women in India,' Laura Dudley Jenkins discussed this historical context. She stated, "During the final decades of colonial rule, Britain granted Indians restricted rights to serve as representatives in legislative bodies. These policies were partly aimed at neutralising nationalists and expanding the 'circle of collaborators,' but they also contributed to 'divide and rule' strategies by granting special electoral privileges." Key policies during this period included the 1909 Indian Councils Act (based on the Minto—Morely Report), the 1919 Government of India Act (based on the Montagu-Chelmsford Proposals), and the 1935 Government of India Act.
Jenkins went on to highlight, "This era also witnessed the initial efforts to establish 'All-India' women's associations, such as the Women's India Association (WIA) in 1917, followed by the All India Women's Conference (AIWC) and the National Council of Women in India (NCWI)."
According to Jenkins, these prominent women's associations actively sought to influence new policies through various means, including passing resolutions, sending delegates to conferences, submitting memoranda and letters, and lobbying decision-makers. She explained, "Their primary goal was securing the right to vote for Indian women, but they also became involved in the matter of reserved seats for women in legislatures. Ironically, even though these major Indian women's organisations initially opposed such reservations, they were granted to them in 1935."
<ins>Constituent Assembly</ins>
The matter of women's reservation also surfaced during the debates in the Constituent Assembly. However, it was ultimately dismissed as unnecessary.
The argument put forth was that in a democratic system with universal adult franchise, women, like any other group, would naturally obtain representation. Renuka Ray, in her address to the Constituent Assembly, voiced her support for Clause 19, particularly Section (2), which advocated for territorial representation without the need for seat reservations. She emphasised the opposition to seat reservations for women, stating, "We are particularly opposed to the reservation of seats for women. Ever since the inception of the Women's Movement in this country, women have fundamentally rejected special privileges and reservations."
"Over the centuries of our decline, subjugation, and degradation, the status of women has also deteriorated to the point where she has gradually lost all her rights, both legally and socially," she continued. "Women in this country have fought for their rights, equality of status, justice, and fair play, and above all, to be able to participate in responsible work in the service of their nation."
Purnima Banerji, another member of the Constituent Assembly, echoed this sentiment, saying, "I want to make it absolutely clear that women do not seek any reserved seats for themselves."
<ins>Women’s organisations rejected reservation</ins>
Prominent figures like Sarojini Naidu were opposed to the idea of reservations for women. During her presidential address to the All India Women's Conference, Naidu emphasised the strength and resilience of women, stating, "We are not weak, timid, or submissive women. We draw inspiration from the courageous Savitri, and we remember how Sita defied those who questioned her chastity."
However, she also made it clear that she did not identify as a feminist. Naidu believed that being a feminist implied acknowledging a life of repression, and she argued against granting preferential treatment to women, viewing it as an admission of inferiority. She asserted that such preferences were unnecessary in India, as women had always stood alongside men in decision-making and on the battlefield.
<ins>National Perspective Plan</ins>
In 1987, a committee comprising 14 members, led by Margaret Alva, who was then the Minister of State for Women, Youth Affairs, and Sports, was established with the aim of addressing social oppression faced by Indian women.
This committee submitted a comprehensive report titled 'National Perspective Plan for Women 1988-2000 (NPP)' to the Prime Minister at the time. The report contained 353 significant recommendations, including proposals for a uniform civil code, equitable property rights for women, the reservation of electoral seats for women, the prohibition of sex-determination tests, and recognising harassment of wives for dowry as a valid reason for seeking divorce.
<ins>73rd and 74th Amendment Acts</ins>
The introduction of articles 243D and 243T into the Constitution via the Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992, and the Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992, respectively, marked the implementation of reservations for women in Panchayats and Municipalities.
These constitutional amendments mandated the allocation of one-third of seats for women in Panchayati Raj institutions, including the position of the chairperson at all levels of these institutions, as well as in urban local bodies.
<ins>Attempts were made in 1996, 1998, 1999, 2008, and 2010</ins>
The journey towards achieving this goal continued with the introduction of the Constitution (81st Amendment) Bill, 1996, in the Eleventh Lok Sabha on September 12, 1996. This bill aimed to reserve at least one-third of the total seats filled by direct election in the House of the People and State Legislative Assemblies for women.
The bill was then referred to the Joint Committee of Parliament, which further strengthened some of its provisions. Notably, it extended the provision of reservation for women even in cases where the number of seats in a State or Union territory was fewer than three. However, the Constitution (81st Amendment) Bill, 1996, as reported by the Joint Committee, lapsed when the 11th Lok Sabha dissolved.
Subsequently, another attempt was made to provide reservation for women in the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, and the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. This effort was embodied in the Constitution (84th Amendment) Bill, 1998, introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 14, 1998. Unfortunately, this bill also lapsed upon the dissolution of the 12th Lok Sabha.
Another endeavour was initiated with the introduction of the Constitution (85th Amendment) Bill, 1999, in the Lok Sabha on December 23, 1999. However, this bill could not progress due to a lack of consensus among political parties. The most recent attempt occurred in 2008 when the then Manmohan Singh government introduced the bill in the Rajya Sabha, where it was passed in 2010. Nonetheless, it remained pending in the Lok Sabha and ultimately lapsed due to the dissolution of that session.

Unveiling the journey: The history of Women's Reservation Bill in India

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695021459191" alt="Historic decisions await in short but significant Parliament session, says PM Modi" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has expressed the significance of the upcoming Parliament session, describing it as "small in duration but big on occasion" and filled with "historic decisions." In his address to the media ahead of the five-day session, the Prime Minister urged all lawmakers to dedicate maximum time to the special session.
Prime Minister Modi emphasised several recent developments that have instilled pride and confidence in the country, including India's Chandrayaan-3 mission, the successful tenure of its G20 presidency, the launch of the 'PM Vishwakarma Mission,' and the inauguration of the Yashobhoomi convention centre. He noted that these accomplishments have generated an atmosphere of festivity and enthusiasm among the public.
While referencing past sessions marked by opposition protests and disruptions, the Prime Minister expressed hope that all members would leave behind their shortcomings and carry forward a spirit of cooperation as they enter the new Parliament building on Ganesh Chaturthi, which falls on Tuesday.
The short but significant Parliament session commenced on Monday and is scheduled to conclude on Friday.
<ins>Agenda</ins>
On Sunday, a meeting brought together floor leaders from various political parties in Parliament, along with several distinguished ministers, including Union Minister Piyush Goyal, who serves as the Leader of the House in the Rajya Sabha. Also in attendance were Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal and Union Minister V Muraleedharan, along with 51 leaders representing 34 different parties.
The schedule for September 19, 2023, includes a photo session from 10.00 am to 10.45 am. Following this, a special function will commence at 11.00 am in the Central Hall. The event will be graced by esteemed dignitaries, including the Vice-President and Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Leader of the House in the Rajya Sabha, the Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, the Leader of the Largest Opposition Party in the Lok Sabha, and members of both Houses of Parliament.
Subsequent to the conclusion of the Central Hall function, both Houses will convene in their respective Chambers within the New Parliament House.
The announcement of this Special Session has taken political circles by surprise, given that parties are currently gearing up for assembly polls in five states scheduled for later this year.
<ins>Bills to be discussed about</ins>
The government has outlined a comprehensive legislative agenda for this special session, encompassing four significant bills. Among these, a crucial bill aims to oversee the appointment procedures, terms of service, and tenures of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners.
In addition to the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, which was initially introduced in the Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon session on August 10, the list of legislative priorities includes 'The Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2023,' and 'The Press and Registration of Periodicals Bill, 2023.' The latter two bills had already secured passage in the Rajya Sabha on August 3.
The 'Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2023' seeks to introduce amendments to the Advocates Act of 1961, while the 'Press and Registration of Periodicals Bill, 2023' looks to repeal the dated Press and Registration of Books Act from 1867.
Furthermore, 'The Post Office Bill, 2023,' also features on the Lok Sabha's legislative docket. This bill, originally presented in the Rajya Sabha on August 10, 2023, is geared towards repealing the archaic Indian Post Office Act of 1898.

Historic decisions await in short but significant Parliament session, says PM Modi

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1694690802566" alt="Delhi liquor scam: Businessman Arun Pillai turns approver alongside five others" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

Reports suggest that businessman Arun Ramachandra Pillai has taken the step of becoming an approver in the high-profile Delhi liquor scam case, currently under investigation by both the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
An approver is an individual initially accused of a crime but subsequently admits guilt and consents to provide testimony on behalf of the prosecution. Pillai had been arrested by the ED on March 7, with the arrest made under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
This development follows the decision of YSRCP MP Magunta Sreenivasulu Reddy, whose name was also linked to the case, to become an approver on September 8. Prior to him, his son Magunta Raghava Reddy had already chosen to be an approver.
Pillai now joins a group of five individuals from South India who have opted to become approvers in this high-profile case, following in the footsteps of Sreenivasulu Reddy, his son Raghava, Hyderabad-based industrialist P Sharath Chandra Reddy, and Butchibabu Gorantla, the Chartered Accountant of BRS MLC <a href="https://policharcha.com/article/nation/8b768817-6ecb-40db-a831-4aa1a09c1805/telangana-cm-daughter-k-kavitha-summoned-by-ed-in-delhi-liquor-scam-case" target="_self">K Kavitha, who has been summoned by ED on Wednesday</a>.&nbsp;&nbsp;
Additionally, businessman Dinesh Arora has also chosen to be an approver, bringing the total number of individuals cooperating in the case to six.
The motivations behind Pillai's decision to become an approver remain unclear, particularly given his status as a key figure in the case. His name had been mentioned in the FIR issued by the CBI when the scam was initially uncovered in New Delhi.
<ins>Raids revealed vital info</ins>
In 2022, the CBI initiated search operations at Pillai's residence located in Sushee Realty's Eden Gardens in Kokapet, Hyderabad. This action came a few weeks following the CBI's raids on residences of individuals allegedly involved in the liquor policy scandal in New Delhi.
In response to an FIR filed by the CBI, the ED swiftly launched coordinated searches at multiple locations spanning New Delhi, Hyderabad, Bengaluru, and Lucknow, all linked to the case.
The ED's operations were based on the same FIR as the CBI's, with separate teams from the ED conducting simultaneous raids at the residences of at least half a dozen individuals, including Pillai, who were named in the FIR.
In total, the FIR listed the names of 16 individuals, including the then-deputy chief minister of Delhi, Manish Sisodia, in a document filed on August 17, 2022.
Following the FIR registration, the CBI executed searches at the residences of Sisodia, Pillai, and other individuals, leading to the seizure of critical documents. Earlier, BRS MLC Kavitha and others had been questioned multiple times by the ED at its New Delhi office, with Kavitha voluntarily providing her mobile phones for examination.
Both investigative agencies have alleged that Pillai, a liquor manufacturer from South India, acted as the public face of the so-called "South Group" and played a pivotal role in the case.
<ins>South Group</ins>
In its inaugural prosecution complaint presented to the court, the ED has alleged that Vijay Nair, the head of communication for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), received kickbacks totaling ₹100 crore on behalf of AAP leaders from what has been referred to as the "South Group," a term used in statements provided by various individuals during the investigation.
The CBI identified prominent figures within the South Group, including Sreenuvasula Reddy, his son Raghava, and Kavitha.
Arun Ramachandra Pillai, a businessman, was apprehended by the ED on suspicions that he was one of the three primary representatives associated with BRS MLC K Kavitha.
In addition to Pillai, two other representatives linked to Kavitha were reported to be Abhishek Boinpally, the proprietor of a beauty salon chain, and Chartered Accountant Gorantla Butchibabu.
<ins>Kickbacks</ins> – money paid to somebody illegally in return for work or help
The investigative agency also revealed that, as part of their agreement, the South Group made advance payments to AAP leaders through Vijay Nair in the form of kickbacks. In return for these kickbacks, the South Group gained unrestricted access, received undue privileges, and acquired shares in established wholesale enterprises and multiple retail zones, surpassing the limits stipulated by the policy, as outlined in the CBI's charge sheet.
To recoup the kickbacks, the South Group's partners were granted a 65 percent ownership stake in Indo-Spirits, in collaboration with Sameer Mahendru, the company's proprietor. Nair orchestrated this partnership arrangement with the assurance of granting Indo-Spirits the wholesale business of Pernod Richard.
According to the investigative agency, the South Group manipulated Indo-Spirits' shares through deceptive practices, concealment, and the use of proxies.

Delhi liquor scam: Businessman Arun Pillai turns approver alongside five others

in the aftermath of India-Canada debacle, the leader of the banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, has issued threats to Canadian Hindus and asked them to leave Canada claiming that they have adopted a “jingoistic approach” by siding with India.

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695192254624" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>


in the video titled “Leave Canada, Indo-Hindus, Go India”, Pannu said, “Indo-Canadian Hindus, you have repudiated the allegiance to Canada and the Canadian constitution. Your destination is India. Leave Canada, go to India.”

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1695192263744" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>


he later talks about a referrendum which will happen on 29 Oct, seeking to blame Indian High Commissioner Verma for Nijjar's murder.

Threats to Indo-canadian hindus in Canada

first that loudmouth Udhayanidhi gave those bad statements about Sanatan Dharma

and now this&nbsp;

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1694698737431" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

a govt university in TN is asking its students to prepare a speech about eradicating sanatan dharma. and i thought the state cant give religious instructions to an educational institute.

Giving religious instructions can still be tolerable, but to target a specific religion is not acceptable. what is happening?

WTF is happening in Tamil Nadu?

Niti Aayog has prepared an ambitious plan to develop Varanasi &amp; adjoining districts on the lines of NCR.&nbsp; <div> </div><div>Varanasi | Ghazipur | Jaunpur | Chandauli | Mirzapur | Bhadohi</div><div> </div><div>Work on this plan to start from next month.</div><div> </div><div>Initial proposals include:</div><div> </div><div><ul><li>Regional rail for faster intercity connectivity </li><li>New industrial clusters along National Highways </li><li>Trade center for handicrafts &amp; GI tagged products </li><li>Automobile manufacturing hub </li><li>Logistic parks along major railway routes </li></ul></div><div> </div><div>This is how a Yogi ji is developing UP.&nbsp;</div>

Good news for Uttar Pradesh

Three security force officers, including an Army Colonel, were killed in a gunfight with terrorists in Kokernag area of Kashmir's Anantnag district.
Colonel Manpreet Singh, Major Ashish, deputy superintendent of Jammu and Kashmir Police Humayun Bhat were critically injured in the gunfight and died later. Bhat died due to heavy blood loss.
The operation against the terrorists began on Tuesday evening in Gadole area, but was called off during the night. This morning, the hunt for the terrorists resumed after information started trickling that they were spotted at a hideout.

You get to see these incidents on regular basis.

Has Kashmir really changed for good?

Just another day at the office in JnK - 3 security force officers were killed in a gunfight 

असम के मुख्यमंत्री हेमंत बिश्वा सरमा ने आज कहा कि जल्दी ही असम में Semiconductor plant लगाया जायेगा.. जिसमें Initial investment होगा लगभग 40,000 करोड़ का.<div> </div><div>असम ने पिछले ही महीने Semiconductor मैन्युफैक्चरिंग के लिए PLI policy भी approve कर दी है... यह करने वाला असम चौथा राज्य है.... पहले तीन गुजरात, उत्तरप्रदेश और ओड़िशा हैं.</div><div> </div><div>असम में पानी की कोई कमी नहीं, जो Chip मैन्युफैक्चरिंग के लिए बहुत जरूरी है...... साथ ही Transport connectivity भी अच्छी है.....6 Airports हैं.... Train Connectivity भी है.. और धुबरी से बांग्लादेश होते हुए Bay Of Bengal तक पोर्ट connectivity भी है.</div><div> </div><div>अगर असम यह कर लेता है... तो यकीन मानिये... पूरे North East की किस्मत हमेशा के लिए बदल जायेगी.</div>

अगा यह हुआ तो Assam (and North East) के लिए बड़ी जीत। 

<div>what are your views on the violence happened in haryana and parts of NCR?</div>

Communal riots in Haryana

attack planned by pakistan killed 5 of our soldiers, how do you think India will retaliate?
Can we expect another surgical strike?

How do you think India will retaliate to the recent attack in Poonch?

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1682091764871" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

I think they don't realise that this is not the India of the past that they can do anything they want or scare us with threats like these. I say bring it on.&nbsp;

I think they don't realise that this is not the India of the past 

<img src="https://api-discussion.policharcha.com/1682091364371" alt="undefined" style="float:none;height: auto;width: auto"/>

This is why he gave that scripted interview. He knew that CBI is coming after him, so he spoke non-sense about the whole Pulwama attack tragedy.
Now he can claim Modi sent CBI after him bcz he gave that interview.

And this is also the strategy adopted by Delhi's Kejriwal. He has been vocal about PM's degree, and how the current PM is just 4th passed. He knows that he is next in line after Sisodia, Jain, and other AAP members, so he is doing everything he can to shift the blame.&nbsp;

Opposition now knows how to hedge

Im seeing people on social media getting angry about the new rules to appoint the chief election commissioner. whats the problem?

whats the problem with a committee to decide the CEC?

An SC/ST court in UP’s Hathras district has convicted the main accused, Sandeep, and acquitted three others, Ravi, Luv Kush, and Ramu, of all charges in the 2020 rape and murder of a 19-year-old woman.
 Sandeep Singh is convicted under IPC section 304 and sections of the SC/ST Act. The family of the victim is planning to challenge this decision in UP High Court.